Natural emerald with inclusions along three directions. Recently, Guild Gem Laboratories received a 10.48 ct sugarloaf emerald (figure 1) for identification and origin determination. The refractive index (approximately 1.58) and specific gravity (approximately 2.80) fell within the range for beryl,and Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) testing confirmed it as natural emerald. Additionally, energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF) analysis revealed Fe, V, and Cr contents consistent with those in Zambian material.

The stone showed interference colors when placed under a polariscope with the bottom facing up. With a conoscope, the optic axis of this emerald was determined to be perpendicular to the bottom. Using the microscope, we found thin platy inclusions arranged in three directions
intersected with each other at 60/120 degree angles (figure2). Those inclusions were mainly dark brownish and transparent with well-formed rectangular shapes, some of which exhibited a light bodycolor resembling an unhealed fracture. Evenly distributed reflective light could be seen
at certain angles. We deduced that those inclusions had relatively smooth surfaces, which means that their original crystal faces were not corroded during the emerald’s formation. Further observation revealed hexagonal inclusions in the basal plane. Owing to uneven development during their crystalline formation, several of them were nearly triangular in shape. Their sides were parallel to the direction of the platy inclusions (figure 3, top). We also found distinct growth lines near the bottom of the sugarloaf perpendicular to the c-axis. These platy inclusions appeared to be con centrated sparsely in a thin layer with a thickness around 1.5–2.0 mm, as shown figure 3 (bottom). The sparseness of the oriented inclusions resulted in the absence of asterism or cat’s-eye phenomena.

Considering the optic axis, we concluded that the platy inclusions grew along the hexagonal prismatic emerald faces, with the hexagonal platy inclusion parallel to the basal plane, as illustrated in figure 4. However, it is still unclear whether they were syngenetic or exsolution, since their well-preserved shapes showed little evidence of corrosion and there was insufficient evidence of exsolution.

Editors’ note: Interested contributors should send information and illustra- tions to Stuart Overlinatsoverlin@gia.edu or GIA, The Robert Mouawad   Campus, 5345 Armada Drive, Carlsbad, CA 92008.
GEMS & GEMOLOGY, VOL. 54, NO. 4, pp. 452–469. © 2018 Gemological Institute of America